4/4/10

CLOSING NOTES

I feel it is important as this chapter is concluded to make an addi­tional comment to all who choose to follow a vegetarian lifestyle. I truly admire anyone who either has a strong enough religious con­viction against the consumption of animal flesh or simply a strong enough love and respect for the animal kingdom that they don't eat these foods. But I must also add that everything I advocate stems from direct and repeated clinical observations, as well as many sci­entific studies, of which I have cited but a few. When one food makes blood chemistries improve and another food has no effect or even worsens blood chemistries, I will empirically support the food that improves blood chemistries. I am only reporting what appear to be scientifically well-founded concepts. If your religion prevents you from eating meat, then so be it. But if your vegetarianism is based on the idea that avoiding animal-based foods is the healthiest possible diet to eat, I would respectfully suggest that such a notion is completely wrong and will be detrimental to your health in the long run, if not sooner.

104 Optimal Nutrition for Optimal Health

around the bay sustained some degree of poisoning from eating the highly contaminated fish. The most common clinical manifestations of the poisoning were tingling sensations/ tremors, muscle weak­ness, slurred speech, tunnel vision, hearing loss, unsteady walking, and other sensory disturbances. Autopsy studies revealed striking brain degeneration, with losses of almost 50 percent of the normal volume and weight of the brain tissue noted. Perhaps the most dis­turbing of the effects of this toxicity occurred in the womb. In all in­stances reviewed, congenital exposure resulted in a substantially higher incidence of symptoms than resulted when a comparable level of exposure occurred in an adult. In addition to the distur­bances already listed, such exposure during fetal development would often substantially delay or even block multiple develop­mental milestones after birth.

Methylmercury poisoning returned to the spotlight in 1971, when an unknown but large number of Iraqi people ate tainted bread. Methylmercury-treated seed grain had been used in the mak­ing of this homemade bread. Bakir et al. were but one of the groups who published their study of this population.1 All of the symptoms noted in Minamata were again seen in the adults consuming large amounts of this bread. However, those exposed in the womb again showed the greatest sensitivity. Some congenitally exposed infants were afflicted with cerebral palsy, altered muscle tone, and delayed onset of the ability to walk.

It is important to emphasize at this point that a couple of the best ways to deal with an acute methylmercury exposure are vitamin C, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), and bioavailable forms of selenium. Vita­min С can be given both orally to bowel tolerance (onset of loose di­arrhea or abdominal cramping) and intravenously in a dose of 50 to 60 grams over several hours. This dose can be repeated as needed, and it can reach a cumulative dose of up to 200 grams daily for a few days if the toxic exposure is severe enough. NAC can also be given along with the vitamin C.

Seafood: Another Source of Toxins 105

Ballatori et al. have published data showing that mice drinking water with NAC will excrete roughly 50 percent of an administered load of methylmercury over a forty-eight-hour period, while the control animals without NAC would only excrete only 5 to 10 per­cent of that load.2 NAC can be taken regularly in doses of 600 to 1,200 milligrams daily, and several grams a day for a few days can be taken when the methylmercury exposure is known to be high. NAC is also believed to exert a protective effect against methyl­mercury for the growing fetus. Qrnaghi et al. found that the effect of NAC was highly effective in blocking the ability of methylmer­cury in mice to either reduce fetus weight or cause fetal death.3

Selenium is known to bind to methylmercury. However, unlike NAC, it does not promote mercury excretion. In fact, selenium sup­plements do not lower the mercury levels in animals given methylmercury, and when appropriate amounts of selenium are given, even higher levels of mercury can accumulate without obvi­ous signs of clinical toxicity. It appears, then, that selenium is a neu-tralizer of mercury toxicity, but it does not promote mercury's elimination from the body. However, do not jump to the conclusion that more selenium is always better. As discussed in greater detail in chapter 8, nearly all supplements can have their own toxicity. Too much needs to be avoided as diligently as too little.

The role that selenium plays in the neutralization of methyl­mercury might help to explain the variable clinical toxicity of fish and other seafood. Hagmar et al. showed that fishermen who had the highest fish intake also had the highest blood levels of sele­nium.4 It seems likely that the methylmercury content in some seafood will be less well "matched" with selenium in its edible flesh than other seafood. Although the amount of unneutralized mercury may not yet have poisoned the fish that ingested it, this fraction can be expected to be much more toxic to the human who eats the fish, since fish appear to be far less sensitive to consumed mercury than are humans. Conversely, some fish that are consumed might deliver

106 Optimal Nutrition for Optimal Health

its mercury in a more neutralized condition, with little apparent clinical toxicity in the consuming human. Furthermore, the actual content of mercury in fish and other forms of seafood can be highly variable, and larger ingested amounts of mercury, whether bound to selenium or not, can be expected to be more harmful and toxic in the long run.

The sensitivity of the person eating the seafood must also be con­sidered. When your immune system has been sensitized to "pro­tect" you from additional ingested mercury, secondary immune reactions can make you very ill when you eat seafood that contains even a small amount of this toxin. And when the immune system is just very weak from long-term toxic abuse and poor nutrition and unable to deal even with minor amounts of new toxins, fish and seafood can prove to be highly toxic meals. It must also be remem­bered that since selenium does not promote mercury excretion, body levels of mercury will continue to accumulate over time. Even if selenium is bound to the stored mercury, a point will be reached when that storage capacity will eventually be overwhelmed. At that point, toxic symptoms will appear.

Perhaps one of the most significant considerations is that greater amounts of stored mercury will result in greater amounts of re­leased mercury when detoxification mechanisms are later stimu­lated. Many people do not even concern themselves with toxins and detoxification until they get a little older and begin to realize that they won't live forever. For this reason, the reemergence of the stored mercury as the body detoxifies will be even more toxic clini­cally in these people, because their immune systems will typically have been stressed and traumatized for a longer time, and immune protection against toxins will be lessened.

It is especially important for pregnant women to entirely elimi­nate their fish and seafood consumption. Although untainted seafood may have substantial nutritive value, it is difficult to have enough nutritive value to counterbalance the effects of any needless

Seafood: Another Source of Toxins 107

fetal exposure to additional methylmercury. Drexler and Schaller found that mercury levels in breast milk were directly and posi­tively associated with fish consumption.5 Furthermore, they found that the mother's consumption of fish appeared to be a larger con­tributor of mercury to the breast milk than the presence of her mer­cury amalgam fillings.

No comments:

Post a Comment